Gap Analysis

Policy-to-control gap analysis reviewers can defend.

Extract control statements from client policies, map them to target frameworks, and generate source-backed gap matrices for reviewer approval.

What changes for your team

Move from repetitive work to decisions people can stand behind.

Start with client policy documents

Upload policies, standards, procedures, and supporting documents. The workflow extracts specific control commitments and normalizes them for review.

Map against the target framework

Each statement is compared against SOC 2 common criteria, ISO 27001 Annex A, HIPAA safeguards, or your firm control library.

Produce verdicts reviewers can trust

The output is a gap matrix with Covered, Partially Covered, or Missing verdicts, rationale, and the specific source paragraph behind each conclusion.

Export to your workpaper format

We shape the output into your Excel workbook, Word template, or internal review format so the team does not need to rework the draft.

How it works

More than a chatbot on top of your documents.

The system works with approved data and tools, shows where important answers came from, handles exceptions, and brings the right person in when judgment is required.

Define the job clearly

Agree on the work, information, business rules, user roles, desired output, and what the AI is allowed to do.

Use the right information

Bring in only the approved documents, records, business data, control libraries, or playbooks needed for the task.

Make answers easy to check

Give your team findings, matrices, notes, data-backed answers, or work queues with sources and clear reasons for exceptions.

Measure before expanding

Track edits, accuracy, time saved, exception quality, and adoption before applying the system to more work.

Designed around your team

Fit the system to the way good work already happens.

Start with one recurring problem. Keep the parts of your process that require expertise, and improve the preparation and handoffs that slow people down.

Who this is for

Teams with repeatable client delivery workflows and repetitive senior review bottlenecks.

  • Cyber compliance consultants
  • Risk advisory teams
  • IT audit teams
  • Framework readiness teams

What we prepare

Repeatable work that can be prepared with source citations before human review.

  • Policy extraction
  • Control mapping
  • Coverage scoring
  • Gap rationale drafting
  • Remediation note drafting

Outputs

Reviewer-ready artifacts shaped to your templates, evidence standards, and client delivery format.

  • Gap matrix
  • Coverage verdicts
  • Source paragraph citations
  • Reviewer notes

What your team sees in practice

Clear steps, clear controls, and a clear role for people.

Your team can see how work moves through the system, where review is required, and what should be tested before the system is used more widely.
01

Upload client policies, standards, procedures, and framework targets.

02

Extract control commitments and normalize policy language.

03

Map each statement against SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or your firm control library.

04

Generate a gap matrix with verdicts, rationale, remediation notes, and source paragraphs.

Reviewer controls

Controls that keep AI as a drafting layer and preserve professional judgment.

  • Covered / Partially Covered / Missing verdict review
  • Source paragraph links for each conclusion
  • Framework overlap visibility
  • Custom rating labels and review language

A good place to start

The conditions that make this work suitable for a focused first release.

  • Policies are available in document form
  • Target framework is known
  • Coverage labels are agreed
  • Reviewers can validate a sample matrix quickly

Related ways to use it

Where your team could go next.

Once the first use case works well, the same trusted information and review patterns can support related work.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Can the verdict labels match our methodology?

Yes. We can use your own rating labels, review language, and control library structure.

Can one policy map to multiple frameworks?

Yes. The workflow can map shared evidence across overlapping frameworks to reduce redundant review.

OpenAI Select Partner

Technology partnership

Build with an OpenAI Select Partner.

Recognized by OpenAI for helping organizations build, deploy, and scale AI solutions.
See how we approach security

Have something in mind?

Which recurring task is taking too much of your team's time?

Tell us about the review, diligence, reporting, data, or document work you want to improve. We will help you find a practical place to start.