Gap Analysis

Policy-to-control gap analysis with AI.

Extract control statements from client policies, map them to target frameworks, and generate source-backed gap matrices for reviewer approval.

Workflow Value

From dense data to defensible action.

Start with client policy documents

Upload policies, standards, procedures, and supporting documents. The workflow extracts specific control commitments and normalizes them for review.

Map against the target framework

Each statement is compared against SOC 2 common criteria, ISO 27001 Annex A, HIPAA safeguards, or your firm control library.

Produce verdicts reviewers can trust

The output is a gap matrix with Covered, Partially Covered, or Missing verdicts, rationale, and the specific source paragraph behind each conclusion.

Export to your workpaper format

We shape the output into your Excel workbook, Word template, or internal review format so the team does not need to rework the draft.

Agent Workflow Architecture

How the AI agent system works behind the page.

Every solution is implemented as a controlled workflow, not a loose chatbot. The agent operates inside approved data scopes, produces inspectable outputs, and routes judgment back to the right human owner.

Scope the job

Define the exact workflow, input sources, business rules, user roles, output format, and what the AI agent is allowed to do.

Retrieve the right context

Pull only approved documents, records, ERP context, control libraries, or playbooks before the agent drafts or acts.

Produce source-visible output

Generate findings, matrices, notes, SQL-backed answers, or queues with source references, exception reasons, and confidence signals.

Validate before expansion

Measure reviewer edits, pass/partial/fail outcomes, time saved, exception quality, and adoption before moving to adjacent workflows.

Workflow Scope

Built around the way your team already delivers work.

The workflow starts with one painful, repeatable use case, then expands only when reviewers and operators trust the source-backed output.

Who this is for

Teams with document-heavy client delivery workflows and repetitive senior review bottlenecks.

  • Cyber compliance consultants
  • Risk advisory teams
  • IT audit teams
  • Framework readiness teams

What we automate

Repeatable work that can be drafted with source citations before human review.

  • Policy extraction
  • Control mapping
  • Coverage scoring
  • Gap rationale drafting
  • Remediation note drafting

Outputs

Reviewer-ready artifacts shaped to your templates, evidence standards, and client delivery format.

  • Gap matrix
  • Coverage verdicts
  • Source paragraph citations
  • Reviewer notes

Delivery Design

What the workflow looks like in practice.

Each solution page breaks the buyer workflow into operating steps, reviewer controls, and pilot-fit criteria a serious business team would ask about.

01

Upload client policies, standards, procedures, and framework targets.

02

Extract control commitments and normalize policy language.

03

Map each statement against SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or your firm control library.

04

Generate a gap matrix with verdicts, rationale, remediation notes, and source paragraphs.

Reviewer controls

Controls that keep AI as a drafting layer and preserve professional judgment.

  • Covered / Partially Covered / Missing verdict review
  • Source paragraph links for each conclusion
  • Framework overlap visibility
  • Custom rating labels and review language

Good pilot fit

Signals that this workflow is ready for a focused 30-day pilot.

  • Policies are available in document form
  • Target framework is known
  • Coverage labels are agreed
  • Reviewers can validate a sample matrix quickly

Related Workflows

Where teams usually expand next.

Most successful pilots start narrow, then expand into neighboring workflows once reviewers trust the output.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Can the verdict labels match our methodology?

Yes. We can use your own rating labels, review language, and control library structure.

Can one policy map to multiple frameworks?

Yes. The workflow can map shared evidence across overlapping frameworks to reduce redundant review.

Automate one repeatable workflow.

Bring the workpaper, evidence review, or diligence process that consumes the most hours. We will map a practical AI-assisted pilot around your methodology.