Start with client policy documents
Upload policies, standards, procedures, and supporting documents. The workflow extracts specific control commitments and normalizes them for review.
Gap Analysis
Extract control statements from client policies, map them to target frameworks, and generate source-backed gap matrices for reviewer approval.
What changes for your team
Upload policies, standards, procedures, and supporting documents. The workflow extracts specific control commitments and normalizes them for review.
Each statement is compared against SOC 2 common criteria, ISO 27001 Annex A, HIPAA safeguards, or your firm control library.
The output is a gap matrix with Covered, Partially Covered, or Missing verdicts, rationale, and the specific source paragraph behind each conclusion.
We shape the output into your Excel workbook, Word template, or internal review format so the team does not need to rework the draft.
How it works
Agree on the work, information, business rules, user roles, desired output, and what the AI is allowed to do.
Bring in only the approved documents, records, business data, control libraries, or playbooks needed for the task.
Give your team findings, matrices, notes, data-backed answers, or work queues with sources and clear reasons for exceptions.
Track edits, accuracy, time saved, exception quality, and adoption before applying the system to more work.
Designed around your team
Teams with repeatable client delivery workflows and repetitive senior review bottlenecks.
Repeatable work that can be prepared with source citations before human review.
Reviewer-ready artifacts shaped to your templates, evidence standards, and client delivery format.
What your team sees in practice
Upload client policies, standards, procedures, and framework targets.
Extract control commitments and normalize policy language.
Map each statement against SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, or your firm control library.
Generate a gap matrix with verdicts, rationale, remediation notes, and source paragraphs.
Controls that keep AI as a drafting layer and preserve professional judgment.
The conditions that make this work suitable for a focused first release.
Related ways to use it
FAQ
Yes. We can use your own rating labels, review language, and control library structure.
Yes. The workflow can map shared evidence across overlapping frameworks to reduce redundant review.
Technology partnership
Have something in mind?