Data-flow map
Sources, processing steps, model endpoints, storage locations, exports, and reviewer touchpoints for the selected workflow.
Security & Governance
We design AI systems for sensitive environments around an explicit customer-approved boundary: on-premise, customer cloud, tenant-isolated managed service, regional deployment, or a documented combination with approved external model services.
We scope the application, storage, retrieval, and model-service boundary for your VPC, on-premise hardware, or dedicated single-tenant environment where appropriate. An on-premise application can still use an approved external model service; that path is documented before sensitive material is connected.
AI should only see what the user is authorized to see. Workflows are designed around row-level security, role-based access, least privilege, and reviewer permissions before answering sensitive queries.
Data extraction, natural-language queries, reviewer edits, and approvals can be logged so compliance teams can inspect how important outputs were produced.
We implement readiness workflows to discover, classify, and mask sensitive data before approved material reaches an AI model for processing.
Security review pack
A workflow pilot should be reviewable before it is connected to confidential files. We prepare the operating and security details around the specific workflow being tested.
Sources, processing steps, model endpoints, storage locations, exports, and reviewer touchpoints for the selected workflow.
Named user groups, roles, least-privilege rules, source permissions, reviewer permissions, and audit responsibilities.
Approved model endpoints, data-sharing assumptions, retention settings, logging scope, and client-owned infrastructure options.
NDA/DPA path, sample-data approach, deletion rules, approval checkpoints, incident contacts, and rollout decision criteria.
Procurement Readiness
Your team should not have to guess how an AI workflow touches confidential data. We clarify the deployment boundary, data flow, access model, retention, and reviewer controls before engineering work begins.
Deployment is scoped around the client's security boundary: client VPC, on-premise, or dedicated single-tenant cloud where appropriate. The final model, storage, and integration path is agreed before sensitive material is shared.
We use only customer-approved model endpoints and provider configurations. Training, retention, residency, and logging terms are verified for the selected provider and recorded in the engagement's data-flow and security design before confidential material is connected.
We can provide the proposed data-flow map, model/provider list, access-control design, logging and retention approach, deployment responsibility matrix, and review checkpoints for the selected workflow.
Retention, export, audit logging, and deletion are defined per engagement. For sensitive workflows, we prefer client-owned storage, minimal retained payloads, and logs that preserve traceability without exposing more content than necessary.
Where the environment allows it, workflows are designed around client IdP, role-based access, least privilege, and audit trails so users only see the sources and outputs they are authorized to review.
We can work from sanitized examples during discovery, execute an NDA before sensitive review, and support DPA or security addendum discussions as part of contracting.
Not currently. Dotnitron does not claim SOC 2, ISO 27001, or ISO 42001 certification. We apply project-level security and responsible-AI controls, document the customer-approved architecture, and provide evidence for the customer's own review; these practices are not an independent organization-wide certification.
Technology partnership
Have something in mind?