Data-flow map
Sources, processing steps, model endpoints, storage locations, exports, and reviewer touchpoints for the selected workflow.
Security & Governance
We build AI systems for environments where client data leakage is unacceptable: on-premise, VPC, tenant-isolated, or client-approved deployment paths.
We scope workflows for your VPC, on-premise hardware, or dedicated single-tenant cloud environments where appropriate. Client files are handled through approved model and storage paths.
AI should only see what the user is authorized to see. Workflows are designed around row-level security, role-based access, least privilege, and reviewer permissions before answering sensitive queries.
Data extraction, natural-language queries, reviewer edits, and approvals can be logged so compliance teams can inspect how important outputs were produced.
We implement readiness workflows to discover, classify, and mask sensitive data before approved material reaches an AI model for processing.
Security review pack
A workflow pilot should be reviewable before it is connected to confidential files. We prepare the operating and security details around the specific workflow being tested.
Sources, processing steps, model endpoints, storage locations, exports, and reviewer touchpoints for the selected workflow.
Named user groups, roles, least-privilege rules, source permissions, reviewer permissions, and audit responsibilities.
Approved model endpoints, data-sharing assumptions, retention settings, logging scope, and client-owned infrastructure options.
NDA/DPA path, sample-data approach, deletion rules, approval checkpoints, incident contacts, and rollout decision criteria.
Procurement Readiness
Your team should not have to guess how an AI workflow touches confidential data. We clarify the deployment boundary, data flow, access model, retention, and reviewer controls before engineering work begins.
Deployment is scoped around the client's security boundary: client VPC, on-premise, or dedicated single-tenant cloud where appropriate. The final model, storage, and integration path is agreed before sensitive material is shared.
No. Engagements are designed around approved model endpoints and private deployment patterns so client files, workpapers, data rooms, and ERP data are not used to train public models.
We can provide the proposed data-flow map, model/provider list, access-control design, logging and retention approach, deployment responsibility matrix, and review checkpoints for the selected workflow.
Retention, export, audit logging, and deletion are defined per engagement. For sensitive workflows, we prefer client-owned storage, minimal retained payloads, and logs that preserve traceability without exposing more content than necessary.
Where the environment allows it, workflows are designed around client IdP, role-based access, least privilege, and audit trails so users only see the sources and outputs they are authorized to review.
We can work from sanitized examples during discovery, execute an NDA before sensitive review, and support DPA or security addendum discussions as part of contracting.
We can walk through the deployment model, data flow, access controls, retention, and artifacts your InfoSec team will need before a pilot.