Evidence piles up fast
Advisory teams can receive 200 or more evidence files for a single engagement, each requiring manual inspection against control requirements and testing criteria.
Evidence Review
Review hundreds of client evidence files against control requirements, flag weak support, and draft source-backed reviewer notes.
Workflow Value
Advisory teams can receive 200 or more evidence files for a single engagement, each requiring manual inspection against control requirements and testing criteria.
The workflow reads the control, request list, testing objective, and uploaded evidence, then checks whether the file supports the requirement.
Missing, stale, incomplete, contradictory, or irrelevant evidence is surfaced before senior review, with notes explaining the concern.
The output is a set of reviewer-ready observations with citations and confidence signals that your team can approve or revise.
Agent Workflow Architecture
Every solution is implemented as a controlled workflow, not a loose chatbot. The agent operates inside approved data scopes, produces inspectable outputs, and routes judgment back to the right human owner.
Define the exact workflow, input sources, business rules, user roles, output format, and what the AI agent is allowed to do.
Pull only approved documents, records, ERP context, control libraries, or playbooks before the agent drafts or acts.
Generate findings, matrices, notes, SQL-backed answers, or queues with source references, exception reasons, and confidence signals.
Measure reviewer edits, pass/partial/fail outcomes, time saved, exception quality, and adoption before moving to adjacent workflows.
Workflow Scope
The workflow starts with one painful, repeatable use case, then expands only when reviewers and operators trust the source-backed output.
Teams with document-heavy client delivery workflows and repetitive senior review bottlenecks.
Repeatable work that can be drafted with source citations before human review.
Reviewer-ready artifacts shaped to your templates, evidence standards, and client delivery format.
Delivery Design
Each solution page breaks the buyer workflow into operating steps, reviewer controls, and pilot-fit criteria a serious business team would ask about.
Ingest evidence files, request lists, controls, and testing objectives.
Classify files by control, system, period, and support type.
Flag missing, stale, weak, contradictory, or irrelevant support.
Draft reviewer-ready notes with source references and exception categories.
Controls that keep AI as a drafting layer and preserve professional judgment.
Signals that this workflow is ready for a focused 30-day pilot.
Related Workflows
Most successful pilots start narrow, then expand into neighboring workflows once reviewers trust the output.
FAQ
Yes. We can design workflows for PDFs, images, spreadsheets, policy docs, tickets, exports, and screenshots.
No. AI drafts review notes and flags issues. Your reviewers make the final call.
Bring the workpaper, evidence review, or diligence process that consumes the most hours. We will map a practical AI-assisted pilot around your methodology.